Today, you
can’t walk into a grocery store without seeing a line of magazines dedicated to
celebrities. We want to know who they’re dating, what they’re wearing, even
what time they walk their dog. It’s a phenomenon that has shaped media. You
can’t leave the house without hearing a story about Kim Kardashian’s latest
Instagram post. There has always been a fascination with celebrities and
Hollywood. With more access to celebrities’ lives through social media, the
line between what is unattainable starts to blur. With technology rapidly
changing, it’s easy to get information like where Taylor Swift likes to eat
dinner. With so many people reading these magazines and tuning into E! News
every night, it’s no wonder we can’t get away from celebrity news. When
something is in demand, it is supplied. We seek out his information through all
the different media channels because we want to feel connected to the people we
look up to.
Why is
there such a demand to know what celebrities are doing? Why are these shows
dedicated to finding out if the gossip is true? Maybe it’s the sheer access we
have. Not even with just the magazines and social media, but the power the
paparazzi has managed to gain in Hollywood. The Paparazzi has been following
celebrities around for decades. They bombard and shout at celebrities hoping to
get some sort of reaction that can be turned into a story. It’s an endless
cycle, and some celebrities are trying to push back. It’s no debate that this
new age of paparazzi is more aggressive than others. They hid in bushes and
wait till they can get a clear shot of Justin Bieber naked on his balcony. They
push people out of the way, and will say anything to try to get a reaction.
Because the demand is so high, it seems like they will do anything to get a
picture.
There is a
certain level of “they signed up for this” when it comes to celebrity culture
in the way they are both praised and torn down. Celebrities fight back against
the paparazzi, like Kendall Jenner, who manages to ignore the hoards of cameras
that follow her around. She occasionally flips the finger, and her BFF Cara
Delevigne has gone on Twitter rants about feeling like a zoo animal. Even with
their pleas the cameras never let up. Kristen Bell and Dax Shepard started a
revolution about putting an end to paparazzi pictures of celebrity children.
They can't necessarily stop the cameras, but they reached out to gossip sights
about not using the unsanctioned photos. And gossip magazines are quick to jump
on the train, anything to make celebrities happy. According to an article by AdWeek, People magazine and Just Jared joining Entertainment Tonight in not
putting up paparazzi photos of celebrities children. The new editor of People
Jess Cagle said they would stop using the photos unless they felt like they
needed to. Sure, it may have lasted for a little while, but it seems both sites
haven’t really stopped. “In his letter, Cagle said People would still run
"sanctioned photos" and in "rare exceptions," unsanctioned
ones. On People.com, which has a dedicated Moms & Babies vertical, there
are still plenty of paparazzi photos of famous offspring to be found, many of
which been posted since Cagle took over as editor” (Bazilian). The paparazzi
photos of Kristen Bell with her daughter are still all over the Internet. Not
even the pleas from celebrities themselves can stop the demand our society has
for celebrity news. The drive for these
pictures is what propels celebrity culture more and more into society. They’re
just like us. Eating a salad for lunch. But they aren’t really like us, and
it’s the unattainable image they perceive that people chase.
Getting
celebrity dirt is also a lot easier than it used to be. Most gossip sites like
to get proof before they post the dirt. Anyone with a camera phone can catch a
celebrity at a bad time. In the article from The New Yorker, the author writes
about how TMZ has a tip line. Anyone with a celebrity story can call into the
tip line. TMZ pays the sources who send them viable information. The access to Hollywood and celebrities has gotten easier, and if
they aren’t careful a waiter can record them scarfing down a sandwich for it to
be posted online the next day. These gossip sites like TMZ take the job
seriously, and act in the way any journalist would. “Indeed, the site has built
a deep network of sources, including entertainment lawyers, reality-television
stars, adult-film brokers, and court officials, allowing Levin to knock down
the walls that guard celebrity life” (Schmidle). They gather and pay these
tipsters to get the dirt they want on any celebrity in Hollywood. Anyone with a connection to Hollywood can sell information. Whether it's personal drivers to flight attendants with access to passenger lists. These sources come from all over, and if they have the proof, TMZ will pay them. There is
money to be made in the exchange of celebrity information. You can catch a
picture of Lindsey Lohan stumbling out of a club, and TMZ will pay you
thousands. The supply and demand chain between paparazzi, tipsters, and sites
like TMZ drives this celebrity gossip train.
Overall,
we are fascinated and drawn to these mysterious creatures. They become
something we both worship and hate. Talking about Britney Spear’s weight gain
is a lot easier than dealing with the problems surrounding our lives. In a
Huffington Post article, the author writes about the fascination we have with
celebrities. “In the public critiquing of such creatures, the American public
is able to indulge in its disgruntled adoration—a mixture of jealous and
disgust—of the celebrity, hating them for their perceived perfection, beauty
and trim bodies, and the endless attention, money, and elegant clothing they
receive—yet all the while wishing we were just like them” (Turriago). There is a
fine line between love and hate. When we see celebrities attack paparazzi, we shake our heads in disbelief, but could we handle dozens of cameras in our face. We don't understand their lure, but we are drawn to it. It's a cycle of building these celebrities up and then tearing them down. We consumer celebrity gossip everyday,
watching their every move, because we look up to these people, but we also love
to watch them fail. Whether it’s catching Ray Rice beat his fiancé in an
elevator or Jennifer Garner pushing her kids on the swing just before her
divorce is announced. We reveal in their success and their failures. There is a
demand because we are every fascinated by the importance of celebrities.
Work Cited
Bazilian, Emma. "People Magazine Is Joining Entertainment Tonight in Banning Paparazzi Photos of Celeb Kids." AdWeek. AdWeek.com, 25 Feb. 2015. Web.
Schmidle, Nicholas. "TMZ Redefines Celebrity Dirt." The New Yorker. TheNewYorker.com, 22 Feb. 2016. Web.
Schmidle, Nicholas. "TMZ Redefines Celebrity Dirt." The New Yorker. TheNewYorker.com, 22 Feb. 2016. Web.
Turriago, Nora. "The Dangerous American Obsession: Why Are We So Fascinated With Fame?" The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 04 Dec. 2015. Web.
I’m so glad Gina wrote about the growth of celebrity culture. I know I am definitely one of those people who loves knowing what certain celebrities are doing because it is a bit of a direct link between me and my favorite celebrity. However, I think because of social media, people think they have the right to know everything about their favorite celebrity’s life. Some people, like the Kardashians, definitely feed into the desire for people to want to know more about them. It is clear from the way we get inundated with photos from their parties, selfies of them working out, and pictures of their children. Other celebrities are just thrown into the fame because of their popularity through music or film. I really do think celebrity culture is becoming a bit of a problem because of how much people just expect to know about a celebrity’s personal life.
ReplyDeleteThe access from social media is a massive reason why people love to know what celebrities are up to. Through social media, I’m able to see Harry Styles’ response to Zayn leaving the band or him tweeting Taylor Swift lyrics. I think the majority of Twitter agrees with me on that considering One Direction have five of the top ten most retweeted tweets of 2015 (Vincent). In a study done, the researchers stated, “Part of the appeal of Twitter, as we will discuss, is the perception of direct access to a famous person, particularly ‘insider’ information, first-person pictures, and opinionated statements” (Marwick & Boyd 172). This directly correlates to what Gina said about how we are fascinated with this “mysterious creatures.” There are accounts on Twitter dedicated solely to updating about what specific celebrities are doing, but we also have the celebrities themselves telling us because that is how they maintain their popularity. Social media is a way for people to feel acquainted with celebrities they love.
When you see the video like the one of Kendall Jenner being hounded by paparazzi, I can definitely see why they are fighting back. I’ve seen a video where paparazzi told fans that were taking photos with Niall from One Direction to get out of the way so they themselves could get their money shot of Niall, and he told them, “They pay my bills, not you.” Stories like this are probably the reason why Kendall and Cara are flipping the paparazzi off constantly. It has hit the point where the celebrities can’t even walk outside without someone rudely invading their privacy just to take a picture. Yet, here I am, still watching these paparazzi videos of One Direction.
It is not just the paparazzi though that feed into this demand. Fans themselves definitely are involved too. If we weren’t so interested in seeing Harry Styles and Kendall Jenner together, they wouldn’t be mobbed walking out of their hotel in New York or Harry’s mom’s iCloud wouldn’t have been hacked just to get pictures of them together. People have gotten to the point where they just expect this direct access to celebrity life at all times.
I personally think our desire for knowing all about celebrity’s lives is getting too extreme. Because of this demand of knowing so much about a celebrity’s personal life, these celebrities cannot ever be normal people. In the end, we may shake our head in disbelief from what the people do to get insight on their favorite celebrity, but we all love knowing about it all.
Works Cited
Marwick, Alice, and Danah Boyd. "To See and Be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter." Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 17.139 (2011): 139-58. Sage. Web. 3 Apr. 2016.
Vincent, James. "Twitter's Year in Review Proves You Can't Beat a Boyband on Social Media." The Verge. 07 Dec. 2015. Web. 02 Apr. 2016.
Gina, I love how you perfectly captured the US Weekly claim, “they’re just like us” and added, “but they’re aren’t really like us.” Whenever I stumble across photos of celebrities’ kids at Disney or out for lunch I can’t help but imagine them being stalked for the sake of a picture. The difference now with the prevalence of social media is that these photos are more in demand and have more ground to cover. Perhaps this is why sources like TMZ are changing their business models. According to The New Yorker, “ TMZ resembles an intelligence agency as much as a news organization, and it has turned its domain, Los Angeles, into a city of stool pigeons” (Schmidle).
ReplyDeleteWith that said I think half the reason I encounter these photos as much as I do is because they are subsequently being forced on us. The purpose of the photos is to fulfill a need the public is obviously creating, even if the majority denies it. I stopped using Yahoo for my personal e-mail because I was being bombarded by celebrity gossip on their ticker. Their “news” seemed to be increasingly more celebrity and entertainment based every time I looked. I would be greeted by the headlines, “Kendall Jenner did what?” or, “Check out Taylor Swift’s new haircut!” and that’s where the, “they’re just like us, but they aren’t really” divide is clear. I ask myself, what does someone have to do nowadays for their hairstyle to be considered newsworthy? I think the answer is less concerned with what they do, rather who they are.
Part of me feels like this push for constant connectivity comes from the desire to be part of the star-studded “in” crowd. By following along with their lives so closely (as provided by the media) these glimpses have turned into all access passes. If we know where they shop, if only for groceries, we might be able to buy the same things and suddenly “they’re just like us” becomes “we’re just like them.”
According to Billboard there is a continued appetite in those under 34 to renew their smartphones and engage with apps and technology. The article further reports, “stars like Taylor Swift and Katy Perry have just under 300 million followers across their Twitter and Facebook profiles combined and offer a glimpse into just how important being able to understand that engagement is" (Billboard Staff). This article in itself is an example of how media reacts to celebrity news, because even Billboard brings them into the conversation. Clearly, these stars are influential and do have the power to impact our popular culture.
Works Cited
Schmidle, Nicholas. “The Digital Dirt: How TMZ gets the videos and photos that celebrities want to hide.” The New Yorker. 22 Feb. 2016 Web. 4 April 2016.
Billboard Staff. “Taylor Swift Wins 'Most Marketable' in New Study, Followed By Justin Timberlake.” Billboard. 14 Jan. 2016 Web. 4 April 2016.
Celebrity life is a mystery that people want to be a part of. Not only does it aid as a good distraction from your own life, but it is also comforting to see that people who we look up to deal with the same things we do. Before social media became prominent in every day life there was a very definitive line dividing celebrities and non-celebrities. However, as it has grown in importance it appears that the line has blurred and celebrities have become more popular. This increase in popularity may stem from the fact that getting noticed by celebrities is now easier than ever because of a simple push of a ‘like’ button.
ReplyDeleteI believe that One Direction played a part in the blurring of the celebrity/non-celebrity line. Not only are they humble about their success, but they take the time to make each and every one of their followers feel appreciated. Whether this involves taking a photo with every person that approaches them or tweeting out their appreciation, they’ve pretty much got the bases covered. This is why I’m not surprised that, “half of the top ten [most retweeted tweets come] from past and present members of One Direction” (Vincent). They changed how the game is played ever so slightly that they began the blurring of the lines. Another instance of the bands popularity happened when, “Louis Tomlinson's tweet to fellow One Direction bandmate Harry Styles shows the social media power of 1D. The Tweet eventually becomes the second most shared Tweet in the social media website's history” (10 Top Entertainment Moments in Twitter History). The power individuals have by clicking one button is insane.
I also believe that social media’s presence in general has created a blurred line because of the check in option. People can follow their favorite celebrities and go to the exact location where they just got coffee, which brings them one step closer to “living their life.”
Platforms such as YouTube have aided in creating celebrities from fuzzy home-recorded videos to HD studio recordings. Nowadays it seems that anyone can be a celebrity if they put their mind to it and make something happen.
As far as getting dirt on celebrities, I understand why it is so popular. Curiosity is a person’s worst quality because it causes them to do stupid things. Selling a new born baby’s photo to the paparazzi to make some money leads to a snowball effect that no one wants to be part of. Also, people want to know what is going wrong in a celebrity’s life, because it makes their life seem more normal. Celebrities are glorified in the eyes of those that strive to be like them, and when they have a mishap it brings them back to reality.
One thing that will stick with me about celebrity culture is how Adele chooses to shield her son from the spotlight because he didn’t choose it – she did. I find that more celebrity parents are doing the same with their children. This may be because they don’t want them to get caught up in the life, or it could just be because they don’t want to see their child’s face plastered over every tabloid with ridiculous stories beside it.
Whatever the reason may be for celebrity actions, their lifestyle will continue to bring amusement to people
Works Cited
"10 Top Entertainment Moments in Twitter History." The Hollywood Reporter. 20 March 2015. Web.
Vincent, James. "Twitter's Year in Review Proves You Can't Beat a Boyband on Social Media." The Verge. 07 Dec. 2015. Web. 02 Apr. 2016.
I don't find celebrity culture disgusting, just pathetic and largely to blame for the rise of Donald Trump, for that matter. We have become so afraid and/or uninterested in the news that we barely even talk about it anymore, we'd rather know what some person we will never meet had for breakfast. This dangerous push away from real events towards totally benign and meaningless ones, has fueled the widespread ignorance that has allowed people like Trump to gain a foothold in the conscience of the American public. Frankly, Trump is a celebrity himself. These stories are often also cruel, one of US Weekly's top stories of the year was the divorce between Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck, (US Weekly) something that I believe should be allowed to stay quiet.
ReplyDeleteCelebrity culture is tearing apart what should be held as inherent values. Privacy and sanctitude have all been thrown out the window in the hopes of making a quick buck. Celebrity culture has also totally shifted the focus away from the art and directly towards the artist. For example, Taylor Swift was named the most marketable musician in a new study released by Billboard (Billboard). They are marketing her image, not her music. Brands want her face on their products because young people "trust" her. If we continue down this path, eventually the art is going to disappear completely and all we're going to be left with is the artist as art.
Works Cited:
1. McRady, Rachel. "See the Top Celebrity News Moments of 2015!" Us Weekly. Us Weekly, 29 Dec. 2015. Web. 05 Apr. 2016.
2. Staff, Billboard. "Taylor Swift Wins 'Most Marketable' in New Study, Followed By Justin Timberlake." Billboard. Billboard, 14 Jan. 2016. Web. 05 Apr. 2016.
Gina,
ReplyDeleteYour blog post offers an insight into the world of celebrities that many people don't see and that's how closely everyone actually is to stardom. It's an intense and crazy spectacle to be famous, which is wildly intriguing to say the least. Many individuals think, why not follow my favorite celebrities on all social media? Why not know what they like to eat, where they like to eat and who they hang out with? Maybe it'll "teach" me how to be famous? These questions are the foundation to an open argument as to why numerous polls show that millennials feel like they are entitled to wealth and convenience. Social media has changed the world and in many ways it has exceeded expectations of how much good this new age has provided, but theres another side to that as well. Due to the fact that the gap between celebrities and "regulars" has been bridged through social media, there's this hora surrounding society that if we pay attention to someone else's life then we don't have to pay attention to our own.
Look at TMZ; they're a website that literally tries to unearth secrets and invade privacy of the celebrity public in order to give the rest of us the chance to view them differently. One could argue that TMZ allows celebs to become "normal" because they take vacations or go to bars or make mistakes just like we do.“TMZ resembles an intelligence agency as much as a news organization, and it has turned its domain, Los Angeles, into a city of stool pigeons” (Schmidle). I'm not saying that celebrities aren't people, but the gap between them and the rest of the public is somewhat warranted because some of them are such spectacles to fans. Being famous can't be a normal life and I truly believe that anyone who wants to be famous or a professional sports player absolutely knows what comes along with being a star. Now, that doesn't give paparazzi or social media the right to invade their personal lives, but unfortunately that's exactly the world we live in. However, that doesn't mean that being able to make a choice goes out the window. Character is tested daily for celebrities and because stars are looked at so closely, they have to be careful. The life one chooses is the life they must live regardless of what comes along with it. The convenience of being able to "follow" our favorite celebrities through social media must be recognized by every star. Is that fair? Absolutely not, but life isn't fair. “Stars like Taylor Swift and Katy Perry have just under 300 million followers across their Twitter and Facebook profiles combined and offer a glimpse into just how important being able to understand that engagement is" (Billboard Staff)."
My hope is that more people start to realize how important their own lives are as opposed to wishing they were like a celebrity. Not only has the line between the stars and the "norms" begun to shrink, but the line between fantasy and reality has as well.
Billboard Staff. “Taylor Swift Wins 'Most Marketable' in New Study, Followed By Justin Timberlake.” Billboard. 14 Jan. 2016 Web. 4 April 2016.
Schmidle, Nicholas. “The Digital Dirt: How TMZ gets the videos and photos that celebrities want to hide.” The New Yorker. 22 Feb. 2016 Web. 4 April 2016.